Training & Development
(For CNM Cases)
Assignment – II
Assignment Code: 2016HR04A2 Last Date of
Submission: 30th April 2016
Maximum Marks: 100
Attempt all the questions. All the questions are compulsory
and carry equal marks.
Section-A
1.
Design a two day Management Development Program on ‘Work Life balance’ for Government School principals under the
Ministry of Education. Give reasons for the training
method used in the sessions. How will you ensure their presence at the Government staff training college? (10+5+5)
2. (i) What
are the training cost heads that you would consider for conducting a 5 day Executive
Development program for a group of twenty junior level executives of an organization at
the company’s on-site
training institute? How would the
benefits be
evaluated? (10)
(ii)
Discuss the training methods that could
be used indicating both the advantages and likely disadvantages of these
methods.
(10)
3. A Management Development Program on Negotiation Skills has been planned in
your company for finance, materials,
marketing and HR executives. Design a training module. Identify the parameters for evaluating this training program.
Create a feedback form that would be
used on the last day of the training program. (10+10)
4. Why
is evaluation of a training program a very critical part of training? What are
the various techniques used for the
evaluation of a training program? How effective according to you is the Kirkpatrick 4 level model? (7+7+6)
Section-B
Case Study
Given below is a training
evaluation form designed by a company to gauge the training effectiveness of it
programs.
Training Evaluation Form
Date: __________________
Title
Locationoftraining:______________________________________________________________
Trainer:
__________________________________________________
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement
with the statements listed below.
|
|
Strongly agree
|
Agree
|
Neutral
|
Disagree
|
Strongly Disagree
|
|
1 The objectives of the
training were clearly defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Participation and interaction
were encouraged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.The
topics covered were relevant to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.The
content was organized and easy to follow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.The
material distributed were helpful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. This training
experience will be useful in my work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. The
trainer as knowledgeable about the training topics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. The
trainer was well prepared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. The
training objectives were met
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. the
time allotted for training was sufficient
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. The
training room infrastructure and facilities were adequate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
5. a. Does this
form consider all levels of the Kirkpatrick model of training effectiveness evaluation? Elucidate with arguments. (10)
b.
Add your
suggestions to make the training evaluation more useful to the organization in terms of both short term
and long term impact. (10)
No comments:
Post a Comment