GM12
Business Communication
(For CNM Cases)
Assignment – II
Assignment
Code: 2016GM12A2 Last Date of Submission: 30th
April 2016
Maximum Marks: 100
Attempt all the questions. All the questions are compulsory and carry equal
marks.
Section-A
1. a. “The individual
factors of a person act as Barriers to Communication”. Is this statement true?
How?
b. What
are the semantic barriers in communication?
2. Write
short notes on the following:
a. Kinesics
b. Proxemics
c. Gestures
d. Netiquettes
(4x5)
3. What
are five W’s and one H of Report writing?
4. Why
good listening skills are effective means of communication?
Section-B
Case Study
Arvind Pandey is a project manager of
Al Saba Construction Company in Muscat. It is a flourishing company with
several construction projects in Muscat and abroad. It is known for completing
projects on time and with high quality construction. The company’s Chairman is
a rich and highly educated Omani. A German engineer is Arvind’s Vice-President
for urban and foreign construction projects.
Three months ago, Al Saba had submitted
a tender for a major construction project in Kuwait. Its quotation was for 25
million USD. In kuwait the project was sponsored and announced by a US-based construction
company called Fuma. According to Al Saba, their bid of $ 25 million was modest
but had included a high margin of profit.
On 25th April, Arvind was
asked to go Kuwait to find out from the Fuma project manager the status of
their construction proposal. Arvind was delighted to know that Fuma had decided
to give his company (Al Saba) the construction project work. The project meant
a lot for Al Saba as they had already put in a lot of effort and money in planning
the proposed construction in Kuwait.
But before Arvind could thank the Fuma
project manager, he was told that their bid should be raised to $ 28 million.
Arvind was surprised. He tried to convince the Fuma project manager that his
(Arvind) company had the best reputation for doing construction work in a cost effective
way. However, he could always raise the bid by $ 3 million. But he wanted to
know why he was required to do so.
The Fuma manager’s reply was, “That’s
the way we do our business in this part of the world. $ 1 million will go to our
Managing Director in the US, I shall get $ 1 million, you, Mr. Pandey, will get
$ 1 million in a specified account in Swiss bank .”
Arvind asked, “But why me?”
“So that you never talk about it to
anyone”. The Fuma project manager said.
Arvind promised never to leak it out to
anyone else. And he tried to bargain to raise the bid by $ 2 million. For,
Arvind was familiar with the practice of “pay-offs” involved in doing business
in the Middle East. But he never personally involved in any such things. He
thought it was against his loyalty to his company and his personal ethics.
Arvind promised the Fuma project
manager that the bid would be raised to $ 28 million and fresh papers would be
put in. He did not want to loose the job.
He came back to Muscat and kept trying
to figure out how he could place the whole thing before his German Vice
President. He obviously was at a loss.
Case Questions:
1. Analyse
the reasons for Arvind Pandey’s dilemma.
2. Does
Arvind pandey really face a dilemma?
3. In
your view what should Arvind Pandey do? Should he disclose it to his German
Vice President?
(5+7+8)
No comments:
Post a Comment