assignmentssolution@gmail.com

Get Assignments and Projects prepared by experts at a very nominal fee.

More than 8 years in assisting assignments and projects/dissertation/thesis of MBA,BBA,BCA,MCA,PhD and others-

Contact us at : Email : assignmentssolution@gmail.com

Help for : SMU, IIBM,IMT, NMIMS, NIBM ,KSBM, KAIZAN, ISBM, SYMBIOSIS, NIMS, IGNOU, XAVIER, XIBMS, ISM, PSBM, NSBM, NIRM, ISBM, ISMRC, ICMIND, UPES and many others.

Help in : Assignments, projects, M.Phil,Ph.D disseration & thesis,case studies

Courses,MBA,BBA,PhD,MPhil,EMBA,MIB,DMS,MMS,BMS,GDS etc

Contact us at : Email : assignmentssolution@gmail.com



Wednesday 17 September 2014

AIMA assignments 2014 : contact us for answers at assignmentssolution@gmail.com

GM06
Business Law and Corporate Governance
Assignment I
Assignment Code: 2014GM06B1                    Last Date of Submission : 15th October 2014                            Maximum Marks: 100
Attempt all the questions. All questions are compulsory and carry equal marks.
Section A
1.    (a)    Define  free consent. What are the different flaws in consent? Explain them with the             help of important and leading cases?
  (b)    “In cases of Equal guilt, the position of the defendant is better than that of the Plaintiff”             Comment.   
 2.     (a)    What are the various ways in which a contract may be discharged?
                (b)    What remedies are available to an aggrieved party on breach of a contract ?
 3.    (a)     Explain the nature of a contract of sale of goods and bring out clearly the distinction
                      between a sale and an agreement to sell.

(b)     Distinguish between condition and warranty. Explain the rule of caveat emptor and state how far it is modified by implied conditions.
 4.     What are the provisions of Sale of goods act in regard to the passing of property in  ascertained  
 goods, unascertained goods, Goods sold on approval or on sale or return.
Section B
Case Study
The Underwood Ltd. Agreed to sell to Burgh Castle Brick a condensing engine on Feb 19,2009. The engine was affixed to the soil, in the premises of the Underwood .It needed to be detached before being dispatched to Burgh by train to yarkmouth, a town in England. Certain parts of engine were sent on first On August 6th2009, while being loaded on to a railway track, the bed plate of engine broke.When the consignment reached  Burge Castle, they refused to accept it as the engine was damaged.
After going through the facts, Answer the following questions-
    (a)    Whether the property had passed to the defendant at the time  when the accident took place?
(b)    Whether within the law on sales of goods act the seller is bound to do something to the goods to put     them in a deliverable state?
(c)    )As per your opinion what is the remedy  the defendant  was left with ?













GM06
Business Law and Corporate Governance
Assignment II
Assignment code: 2014GM06B2                             Last Date of Submission : 15th November 2014
                                      Maximum Marks: 100
Attempt all the questions. All the questions are compulsory and carry equal marks.
Section A
1.       (a)     Define negotiable instrument? Draw the specimen of three important               
                         Negotiable  Instruments.
    (b)    What is meant by dishonor by non-acceptance or dishonor by non-payment?
    (c )     What are the penalties prescribed in the Negotiable instrument Act in case of             dishonor of a cheque for insufficiency of funds in the account of the person             issuing the cheque?
2.     (a)    Classify the companies on the basis  of liability,On the basis of number of                 members and on the basis of control.
    (b)    Define “Prospectus “. When a company not required to issue a prospectus? Also             explain the liabilities for mis-statement in the prospectus?

3.    What  do you mean by Winding up of a company? What are the different modes of     winding up.

4.       (a)    Define Stakeholders theory applied in Corporate Governess  And  mention             features of Sarbanes  Oxley Act 2002.
    (b)    Explain the Satyam case as a failure of corporate governance system and                 compare it with Enron case of USA .
                    
Section B
Case Study
                                                                                                                                                                        
Mr. Wall, as the secretary of East Holyford Mining Co, signed a letter to its Bank, forwarding a resolution of the board of directors. The resolution named three directors, and instructed the bank to pay cheque signed by any two of them and countersigned by the secretary. Specimen signatures were attached. The instructions were entirely in accordance with the company’s memorandum of article. However there had never been any proper  appointment of directors or a secretary by the company. Those who had formed the company had assumed these roles .Following the letter,the bank had honoured the  cheques in accordance with the instruction contained in  the letter.
 Please answer the questions  below-
   (a)    Whether the company was bound by the cheques?
   (b)    Whether the  bank be bound in exercise of ordinary care and precaution,to know     whether or not that company is actually carrying on transacting business or not.
   (c)     In the light of this case explain the benefit of the doctrine of indoor management.
   (d)     Who will be  asked to compensate the loss of the Bank




No comments:

Post a Comment